Comment Challenge Day 14: Turn Your Blog Over to Your Readers

Clarence Fisher’s recent post suggests giving students the flexibility to choose what they want to learn about.  I think this is an good idea and I recommend you read more about it on his blog.

The comment challenge for today involves turning your blog over to your readers and asking them to write a post through the comment section.  So today, I’m asking readers for their take on how much choice students should have in defining curriculum.  Are there any limits?  What does choice look like for a kindergartener as opposed to an ninth grader?  Should there be any required learning?  If so, what knowledge and skills must be required?  I’m eager to hear what you think.

What’s in a name? (My fulfillment of Comment Challenge 13)

Three recent commenters began their comments with the following greetings:

“Hey Kam, . . . “

“Hi, Kam, . . . “

“Thanks Kam . . . “

Today’s comment challenge involves creating a post using comments, which is convenient for me because I now that I’ve been addressed as “Kam” three times, I probably ought to clear up the confusion that I’ve created. My username for WordPress, meebo, Twitter, del.icio.us, Diigo, StumbleUpon, and the assorted Ning networks to which I belong is “kamccollum”. However, my name isn’t “Kam”. KAM are my initials. My name is Kimberly, Kimberly A. McCollum.

It’s nice to be in a friendly community and to be on a first-name basis with people from around the world, but if I’m to be on a first-name basis, I’d really like it to be my first name. I’m not silly enough to be offended by being called the wrong name, especially since it’s my fault for only including my name in my very first post. (Today I amended my “about” page to include my real first name.) However, being called “Kam” made me feel like they were talking to somebody else and led me to think a little about the nature of identity online.

I see a wide variety of usernames among my students. Many of my students are college juniors and seniors who are still using online identities that they created in high school. I suggest to my students that should create a “professional persona” based on their name, but I still receive emails from “brattyangel”, “pinkprincess”, “ditzyblonde”, or “studman” (I made these up, but they are inspired by experience). Maybe I’m wrong, but I have a feeling that parents may take an email less seriously from “brattyangel” or “studman” than they would from “miss.thompson” or “teachersmith”.

I created kamcollum less than two years ago, when I decided it was time to stop using my maiden name as my email address. I would have preferred the email address “kimberly.mccollum”, but someone else beat me to it. I considered both kimccollum and kamccollum, but since I didn’t want people to think I was Kim C. Collum, I went with kamccollum, which I read K. A. McCollum. I’m comfortable with kamccollum, because I feel like I’m the same person online as off. I’ve stuck with kamccollum for consistency and to limit the number of usernames that I have to remember. I wonder though, how do others decide who they will be online?

Beyond usernames, what makes an online identity? Sue Waters had a post about the importance of developing an online identity a while back, but I think the username and avatar are only part of the picture. Once people can recognize us, what will think of us? It’s mainly our words, in blog posts, comments, etc. that make up our online presence. To me, the question then becomes, how much do we reveal about ourselves? I’ve revealed my name, my occupation and some of my professional interests. I’ve also revealed that I taught 8th grade in Baltimore for Teach for America, that I once one an award for teaching in a suburb, that I grew up in Maryland, that I’m married, and I’ve only been swimming in the sea once. That’s really not much to go on. I’m wondering, how much should we reveal about ourselves and when?

Comment Challenge Day 12: Make Sure Your Blog Technology is “Comment Friendly”

In today’s activity, you’ll be looking at how the technology on your blog may or may not be inviting comments. Check out this post about some of the difficulties Silvia has seen in trying to leave comments at other blogs and make sure that your blog isn’t having these problems. Also review Sue Waters’ post on the matter. Then see what you can do to address any of these issues on your own blog.

When I was writing my comment policy (just a few minutes ago), I went into my settings to make sure that commenters didn’t have to be logged in to comment. I also changed the moderation settings so comments should show up as soon as they are posted (as long as they aren’t spam). I don’t think that the technology is creating barriers to getting comments on my blog. It’s probably my writing.

With this post, I have finally caught up on the comment challenge. (I didn’t respond to day 7 because I suspect that day 14 might be another “reflect on what you have learned post” and I think my reflections can wait until then.)   Maybe I’ll even get back to “regularly scheduled programming”.

Comment Challenge Day 11: Write a Blog Comment Policy

In this activity, you’re going to write a comment policy for your blog. If you have one already, you’re going to review it and make any revisions you think are necessary after reviewing some of the following articles and thinking through what you’ve learned from your own experiences as a commenter.

I can’t remember ever having read a comment policy before reading the above articles. My general feeling about comment policies is that if they allow comments, I expect that as long as I am civil and not spam, I’ll be heard. Thus far, I’ve never been disappointed. Additionally, I believe that if someone isn’t being civil, it is unlikely that reading a comment policy will inspire them to “play nice.”

I think a simpler policies are better. So here is my comment policy:

  1. As soon as someone completes the comment form, which includes spaces for your name and your email address, the comment will be posted.  I promise not to share email addresses, but I may use email to contact individuals about their comment in order to further the conversation.
  2. I don’t expect problems, but if I feel that a comment is uncivil to me or to other commenters or if comment contains spam, I reserve the right to  delete it.  Additionally, I reserve the right to block commenters that are continually uncivil or who are habitual spammers.
  3. If this comment policy doesn’t work, I reserve the right to amend it in the future.

Comment Challenge Day 10: Do a Comment Audit on Your Own Blog

For today’s task, review this post on 6 Reasons People Aren’t Commenting on Your Blog. Then audit your blog to see if you’re falling into any of these traps. If you’re feeling particularly brave, ask a fellow blogger or even your readers to give you feedback on how well you’re doing at making people feel welcome to leave comments on your blog. Then reflect on what you’ve learned and try to address any of the issues you identify. Be sure to tag your post with “comment08.”

According to post suggested above, there are at least six possible reasons that people don’t comment on blogs:

  1. It sounds like a press release. (I don’t think my voice is formal enough to fall into this trap.)
  2. It sounds like an infomercial. (I certainly haven’t tried to sell anything, though I did recommend Diigo over Del.icio.us in a post.)
  3. It sounds like the author is a know-it-all. (I’m to ignorant to be a know-it-all, but maybe I do sound like one.)
  4. The author hasn’t shown them how. (Maybe I’ll do something like Michele Martin’s Newbie Guide for her blog.)
  5. The author hasn’t created the right atmosphere. (I try to invite comments on some posts by asking questions, but I haven’t given much thought to my blog’s overall atmosphere.)
  6. The author doesn’t seem that into it. (I don’t think my writing captures my passion for the subject.)

I only started this blog a few months ago, so I have a small readership. In general, I’m pretty amazed that I get as many comments as I do (that is any comments at all). However, I have to admit that I sometimes feel a little let down when a post that I put a lot into doesn’t get commented on. I may be guilty of some of the traps listed above, but I suspect that the main reason for the lack of discussion on my blog is that I’m not yet creating posts that my fellow edubloggers want to read, let alone comment on. While I wish that my writing were so compelling that everyone in the edublgosphere wanted to respond to it, I know this is not the case. To make a connection to Lave and Wenger, I am experiencing legitimate peripheral participation (with emphasis on the peripheral). I expect that if I keep at it, in time, I will learn enough to be able to contribute posts that are more central to the larger conversation. In the meantime, I welcome any readers that do visit to make suggestions on what I could do to create an atmosphere that is more inviting for conversation. Also, what kind of things would you want to read a newbie post about?

Comment Challenge Day Nine: Should We Be Commenting on Blogs?

Check out this article and the many references to bloggers who think that comments should be disabled on blogs. Read through those posts and consider whether or not you think it’s better to build community through comments or through conversations occurring across blogs–or maybe a combination of both. What, to your mind, is the purpose of comments on blogs and are we better served by encouraging people to respond to ideas on our blogs or over on their own blogs? Then write a post on your reflections.

I can’t remember where I read it (and I suspect that Googling it would result in more than one credited source), but I have read that a blog without comments is just a webpage. I believe that blogging should be about conversations, rather than soapboxes. Conversations across blogs can be effective, but I find them harder to follow than a comment thread, especially when each blog has its own set of comments to read. Having to follow a conversation all over the blogosphere is tiring and creates a barrier to participation. Additionally, I suspect that many, if not most, people read blogs on a wider range of topics than they personally blog about. People will participate in conversations on other blogs that they would be reluctant to start on their own. As Connie Crosby stated in response to “Rethinking the blog comment policy” on the blog Eloquation, “Comments I would have wanted to make did not necessarily fit in with the focus of my own blog, so I would not be likely to post a response there.” When a blogger disables comments on his blog he limits the conversation in the community. Even though I am in favor of commenting on blogs, I believe that individual bloggers have the right to make up their own mind when it comes to allowing comments on their own blogs.

Comment Challenge Day 8: Comment on a Blog Outside of Your Core Niche

In today’s challenge, you’re going to find and comment on a blog that is outside of your normal interest areas.

Today I found came across a blog  post and I can’t even remember how I got there.  The blog is called e-politics which places outside of my usual blog reading in the edublogosphere.  However, one of my Master’s degrees is in Public Policy, so it isn’t surprising that it caught my attention.  It was interesting to see someone discussing some of the familiar tools for different purposes.  I started to think a little about what are the broader similarities and differences between online advocacy and online education.  My thoughts are still developing, but both involve sharing information, so there’s got to be some overlap.

Comment Challenge Day 6: Engage Another Commenter in Discussion

For today’s task, courtesy of Bill Ferriter, you are going to engage another commenter in conversation. Find a post where other people have commented before you and then respond to something one of the commenters has said.

Is it cheating if the post you find is on your own blog?   :)

It took me several days to find a conversation to join, not because there is a paucity of discussion in the blogosphere, but because I was looking for a conversion that I felt comfortable jumping into and one where I wasn’t the first commenter.  I found a post on Vickie Davis’ blog that detailed some frustrations with Windows Vista.  I have Windows Vista and while there are some things I like about it, I am enough dissatisfied that I have been toying with the idea installing Linux on my next machine.  A few of the previous commenters had mentioned using Linux, so I took the opportunity to ask them about the pros and cons of Linux.  I don’t know if they will respond, but gave it a shot.

More about teaching in Baltimore . . .

Here is another post from my forgotten blog. This is probably the most important thing I learned from my experience in Baltimore, maybe even in my entire teaching career.


One of my students in Baltimore, lets call him “James”, used to joke about being a “four year veteran” of our school. Middle school, of course, is only supposed to last three years. Whenever James had neglected class assignments or homework I would warn him that if he weren’t careful, he’d be a “five year veteran” of our school. To me, James didn’t appear to care about education in the least.

In Baltimore, at least when I taught there, middle school students had to apply to high school. The best students were skimmed by the “city-wide high schools” and the rest were relegated to zone schools. At the zone schools the drop out rates were so high that the freshman classes are larger than the sophomore, junior, and senior classes combined.

For my eighth graders, the period between applying for high school and receiving their acceptance letters was a time of terrible anticipation. During this time, a student of mine, “Suzie”, announced to her class that she had been accepted to Baltimore City College, one of the best of the city-wide schools, but that she wasn’t going. Knowing Suzie’s grades and test scores, I recognized her announcement as an attempt to save face, but smiled encouragingly. However, James began to lecture her about the importance of an education; telling her she had to go. “If I got into City,” he said, “I’d bust my work.” Suzie quickly admitted that she hadn’t been accepted at city, though she had gotten into one of the less competitive city-wides. The class went back to work, but that moment stayed with me. It wasn’t until then that I realized that James, despite appearances, valued education highly, but saw it as an unattainable goal.

I just finished reading “Self-Efficacy”, an article by Albert Bandura. The article is more real to me because I have known James. “There are countless attractive options people do not pursue because they judge they lack the capabilities [I would add opportunities] for them.” This is a sad reality for inner-city children. I believe one of the most important ideas with which we can equip our children, either as parents or as a society, is a sense of self-efficacy.

Fortunately for James, one of our administrators took him under her wing and helped him to transfer from the zone high school to a city wide after ninth grade. When I last saw him, he was on the football team and planned to be the first in his family to graduate high school. I’ve lost track of him, but I hope he made it.

Teach for America and me

Today I commented on a blog post about the sad state of education in America. I began my career as an educator in Baltimore City as a member of the Teach for America 1998 Corps. Baltimore, with a graduation rate of only 38.5% is surely one of the saddest educational systems in the nation. I fulfilled my two year commitment, worked as hard as I could to instill high expectations, and left feeling inadequate to the task.

I wrote the following post nearly a year ago on the first blog I ever tried to keep. I suspect it has never been read before, and today it felt relevant to me.


“Teacher trainers often remark that the brightest and most able students often experience considerable difficulties in their first placements as teachers. The diligence, attention seeking, and strong self-image that in the past rewarded them with teacher approval and fine grades are not traits that help others –i.e. students—to personally interact with ideas.”
-- Facilitating Online Learning p.167

The quote above made me think of my first placement as a teacher. I mentioned a few posts back that I am an alumna of the Teach for America program, selected largely because of my success as a student. By the time I graduated university, I was no longer an academic attention-seeker; I preferred to sit quietly and go unnoticed in the back row of any lecture hall. Still, I was diligent with a strong self-image and had considerable difficulty in my first placement as an 8th grade physical science teacher in inner-city Baltimore. I was a much better teacher my second year than my first, but I still felt inadequate.

Linda Darling-Hammond and others have criticized TFA for placing unqualified teachers in the classrooms that need qualified teachers the most. There is some truth to this criticism; I admit that I was not “highly qualified” to teach in an inner city school. However, the uglier truth is that the certified teacher who worked in my classroom before me had stopped teaching. Every day students came to her class to watch movies, usually R rated. Unqualified though I was, I was better than the alternative, and science test scores went up both years that I taught there.

Darling-Hammond argues that teacher quality is the most important variable in the education production function and tends to define teacher quality as pedagogical content knowledge. In her studies, she uses Praxis test scores, education courses, certification or some combination of these variables to serve as proxy variables for teacher quality. I passed the Praxis, even the pedagogy section, without ever having taken an education course, which lead me to suspect that either a flaw in the test or that value of the courses was highly overrated. Based on my personal experience, I think both explanations have value. As soon as I started teaching, I enrolled in a graduate program in Curriculum and Instruction. Some of the courses were helpful and all of them were easy. I felt that the skills that I learned in my courses could have been taught on the job in a good professional development workshop.

One of the most pivotal moments in my teacher training came when I was being observed during my first year teaching. One of my instructors was sitting in the back of my classroom, observing my lesson when the fire alarm went off. She hurriedly packed her belongings and then stared at me aghast as I continued teaching my lesson without interruption. I really believe that she thought I was oblivious and that I would allow my students to be consumed by flames. I watched for her confused reaction when the announcement that my students and I knew would come, came,”Please disregard the fire alarm.” This scenario repeated itself, as it usually did, three or four times during the course of my 55 minute lesson. At the end of my lesson, my instructor asked if this often happened. “Almost daily,” I replied. She looked at me, horrified, and asked, “How can you teach like this?” I remember thinking, “Aren’t you supposed to be teaching me?”

As you might imagine, I don’t have a lot of confidence in traditional teacher training programs.


I went on to become “Science Teacher of the Year” in the suburban school district where I next taught and I sometimes still feel guilty for having left the classroom, particularly the inner city classroom where I know I was needed so much. I am now an instructor of teacher preparation courses. I don’t know how to make a student “highly qualified” for the kind of teaching environment that I faced in Baltimore.